This website is dedicated to the works of Manly P. Hall, a great occult scholar, philosopher and sage,

as a sign of deep respect and gratitude.

16 травня 2022 р.

Training the Faculty of Intuition

 

(Transcript by Tob Hawk)

I think perhaps it would be important, or at least useful, to try to understand a little better some of the mysterious workings that occur within ourselves. And perhaps one of the most important of these is generally referred to as intuition. What it is, how it originates, how it functions, has not yet been standardized or classified. Perhaps one of the most important and direct means of estimating this faculty is by reference to Buddhism, because this great Eastern philosophy explored so many of the subjective aspects of human consciousness.


According to Buddhism, man has what is called the six sensory, or six sensatory, machines. These consist of the five senses, with which we are familiar, and the sixth factor, which is called “the mental coordinator”. The purpose of the mental coordinator is to compute the testimonies of the sensory perceptions. It further has to bring to bear upon all new evidence, all that is already available within the consciousness of the individual himself.

Every moment testimonies of one kind or another are entering into our mental lives through the sensory faculties. Of course, the most important of these faculties are the faculties of sight and hearing, but even those less highly specialized also contribute a variety of supporting evidences of our conduct and our attitudes toward life. The coordinator has as its primary function to digest and assimilate all new evidence and incorporate it into the permanent structure of human insight.

This means, in substance and essence, that constantly the individual is adding to his store of knowledge but is not aware of the process. He pays little conscious attention to the things that occur around him, but subconsciously he is aware of all of them. We know through hypnotic research and through regression that there is scarcely a detail in the life of the individual which is not permanently recorded. To the Buddhist this record is due to the constant, precise functioning of the mental coordinator.

This faculty takes control of all types of phenomena. It gives us a constant insight into everything that makes up our daily living. It also exercises a censorship, for when something occurs to us which is contrary to the basic structures of our nature, this difference, this inconsistency is also listed. Today especially, the environment is constantly bombarding us with material which is not essential, not useful, and even is dangerous or detrimental. This is also filtered out by the coordinator, and as a result of this the individual learns not only what to do but what not to do. There is a relationship between this problem and that of conscience, but conscience is essentially a moral issue arising in the internal psychic integration.

The actual record of experience is brought in through the coordinator. The reason this is possible is because nature is a systematic structure. Nature does not feed into the sensory perceptions uncensored material, it brings to the sensory perceptions a great deal of rather well clarified information. It brings in also new ideas. It reminds us of things long past. It brings the wisdom of our childhood to bear upon the thoughtfulness of our mature years. From the cradle to the grave the record is unbroken, and into this structure there is brought such a mass of information that were it not for the incredible skill of the sensory computer, most of the value of living would be lost.

After the information has been brought in, classified, organized, and censored by previous information, has been variously cleansed of errors and supported by previous evidence that has been assembled, it then becomes available to us for the re-expression or the externalizing of our attitudes. Attitudes are largely based upon the testimonies of this computerization process.

As we study this a little more carefully we find some interesting points, namely that nearly all information regarding the material life of man originates in his environment. The individual is placed in a situation in which he is constantly taking in material, reorganizing it, and releasing it again into his environment. Therefore, in silence he gains the wisdom of the coordinator, and every time he opens his mouth he expresses some part of this coordinated knowledge.

Actually, we are not conscious of a large part of the basic factors of attitudes. We do not know really why we think the way we do. We do not know why we have certain reactions to occasions and occurrences. We do not know why we suddenly blurt out something we did not intend to mention, nor do we know why at another moment we hold secret that which might be beneficial to general knowledge. We have a dispositional factor and this dispositional factor represents to a very great degree the workings of the conscious mind. The coordinator, however, goes behind the conscious mind. It goes back to the very root of intellection within ourselves.

Therefore, it is quite possible for the individual living only upon the surface of his perceptions to be easily deluded, to misunderstand, and have poor judgments on a variety of matters. He is then, so to say, speaking off of the front of his mind, or thinking from that front. This thinking is also supported by the faculty perceptions. They not only testify to value but in an undigested state they bear witness to occurrences as they appear to be. It is only after the evidence has passed through the coordinator that its basic value is clearly determined.

One of the reasons why we have so much trouble in our daily living is that we are unable to allow the coordinator to function properly. We are constantly interfering with it, or trying to. The interference is on the surface because we cannot get back into it. The interference arises from superficial thinking and undisciplined attitudes. The individual who is the hopeless victim of his own mental processes or is completely dominated by his emotional intensities is not aware of the availability of any higher form of thinking. He is simply limited to the immediate. That which comes in goes out instantly, but the record that passes through the coordinator still continues to exist but is not so quickly or easily accessible.

If, therefore, we study people carefully, we realize that intuition is of many degrees and occurs variously in different age groups. It is much more commonly found in the feminine than in the masculine temperament, and is perhaps very powerful in small children. This is due largely to the fact that the conscious mind has not interfered with the intuitional process which has brought into play not only the evidence of the present existence but, to a large degree, the balance of previous life patterns. This coordinator extends back to and into previous embodiments because it is the reservoir of the complete accessible knowledge that the person has accumulated in his evolutionary process. This knowledge is not carried forth as simple incidents, but in the form of general value, final conclusions, ultimate decisions as they arise in the processes of living.

The intuitive person is most likely to be a person who is essentially mentally and emotionally honest. Intuition functions in spite of mental interference, to some degree, but more clearly and completely where this mental interference is eliminated. How do we eliminate the mental interferences that arise every day, how do we escape from false, superficial testimonies? The interval between the coordinator’s function and that of the objective mind is greater than most people realize. The objective mind is simply arriving at a series of superficial conclusions on all subjects, whereas the coordinator brings out only a seasoned account.

The sensory perceptions have much more in the form of information than we first realize, but if we are constantly betraying the testimonies, if we fail to allow this coordinating process to function smoothly and directly, we are less intuitive. We are intuitive largely to the degree that we get out of the way of the computerizing process. If we constantly interfere with it, if we constantly go against its testimonies, if we constantly press our own personal attitudes against that which is best, we will have trouble.

Intuition is most obviously available where there is less interference in the processes of learning. False learning betrays the coordinator but does not attain a victory because the coordinator sorts it out, but it can betray the conscious mind, it can lead the conscious mind into a variety of difficulties. One of the laws in nature which we cannot resist is the law of cause and effect. Really, the computer works upon this basic fact all the time. Every cause has an effect. When we use the frontal thinking of the mind only, causes and effects are hopelessly confused, but they are never confused in the coordinator. Everything that we do has results and consequences. If we perform an action without any particular intellectual support, the results will be heterogeneous. Some will be good, some will be bad, some will be worthless. But other ways of approaching the problem indicate that within ourselves the coordinator already knows from its accumulated statistics almost exactly what the consequences will be of any action which we indulge in.

The coordinator is prophetic, not because it has some mysterious faculty beyond comprehension, but because it is basically, essentially, and eternally honest, and honesty inevitably results in a kind of prophetic power. We see this around us in society. We are today faced with numerous examples of it. Thoughtful persons realize that the present dilemmas are largely due to our own making, that we are responsible for the conditions which affect us adversely. A few, twenty or twenty-five years ago, proclaimed exactly what is happening now. They knew it was going to happen, that it had to happen under a world governed by immutable laws and facts. Those persons who saw more clearly are the ones who took advantage of the testimonies of the coordinator.

The majority, using the frontal mind only, refused to accept the operation of cause and effect. They preferred to think in terms of luck, providence, or of some strange intercession which would take care of everything. Rather than to trust to the internal faculty which would have given them intuitive insight, they chose to continue in their way, deny the obvious, and finally fall into the dilemma.

Intuition, in one sense of the word, is simply a clear recognition of values. It is possible in almost every instance to determine the outcome of any course of action by considering the motives which impelled it, the methods by which this action was carried out, and most of all its final relationship to universal law. Is it acceptable to the law? If it is not, it is doomed to fail.

Actually, however, these large concerns are not always so obvious to us, for there are all kinds of experiences and circumstances which can affect the intuitional process. We know, for example, that there are laws governing the structure of the human body. Lavater, the great physiologist and physiognomist, pointed out that everyone’s fortune is written on him, but we do not know this and we do not notice it with the superficial faculties that we possess, but the coordinator does. The coordinator does notice it because in the subconscious of ourselves we have already passed through similar experiences. We have already been deceived in the same way many times ago. We have made false pretenses — not just once but hundreds of times, and the outcome of every attitude that we take is obviously to be determined by reference to our own internal reference frame which, however, we usually ignore.

There is no doubt in the world, for example, that the coordinator, looking at the face of a person, can tell almost certainly whether that person is honest or dishonest, whether they are happy or miserable, whether they are trustworthy, whether they are sincere in their relationships, whether they can be depended upon in emergencies. And also, all of the befitting and bewildering inconsistencies will be stamped upon the face. It also follows, as Lavater points out, that the body is constantly testifying to the motives of the person, for long ago in ages past these motives shaped the body, and gradually in each embodiment the internal person gradually transforms the outer person into the semblance of itself symbolically. The way we walk, the way we use our hands — all these things tell what we are.

An interesting story which might bear repeating illustrates this. A bank teller was given a check to cash by an unknown person. The bank teller was suspicious. He did not know why he was suspicious, but he held back the check and asked an official of the bank to verify its authenticity. The check was a forgery. The teller was never able to say just how he knew it was a forgery, but he said when he looked at the man who was cashing the check, he instantly knew that the man was dishonest. That could be called clairvoyance almost, certainly an extrasensory decision, but it was simply a plain state of the coordinator taking over.

Insight of the individual, the background of his experiences, the people he had known, the lives he had lived — all of the incidents of life combined to make his decision possible. He was aware because in the coordinator a series of facts were assembled. He also was aware because of the distinguishing marks upon the face of the man. He did not know what those marks meant, but the coordinator did. It could read character because it was built upon the testimony of thousands of years of experience by that entity in its evolution through the universe.

All these different factors add to the development of an internal recognition, estimation or analysis.

We know that doctors who are really well versed in their profession are able to diagnose a patient before he sits down for a diagnosis. The doctor knows what is wrong with the person when he enters the room. The doctor himself probably would not be able to entirely explain the reason that he knows. But if we went into the coordinator, it would be the result of working with hundreds of persons, working with their problems, classifying their ailments and symptoms, and storing this all away in the inner consciousness. When the need arises this information would be instantly available. One doctor told me that he was very reluctant to ask people to have laboratory tests and laboratory work. He said, “I know what is the matter with them almost instantly, but I have to tell them to go and have these tests because, if I do not, I could be sued for malpractice.” If anything went wrong, even if it was the patient’s fault, the doctor would be held responsible because he had not had the laboratory work done.

Another very interesting field is in the ministry of priesthood. The average priest or minister in many instances can tell immediately the problem of the person who comes to him for assistance. It is some way written on that person. It is not a transference of thought, but a recognition of symptoms and a proper process of association of ideas. All these symbols add together to a directive, to an indication of that which is correct and that which is incorrect.

Another thing that forms in the assisting factor is that where we are long associated with people. We have a tendency to let down the barriers of our own judgment. We have a friend who has been a friend for years. We know that friend has shortcomings and that they are not always just what they ought to be, but in the term of friendship we overlook hundreds of little testimonies which should have told us something. When the friend in turn becomes an enemy we are amazed because we did not believe that this could happen. But it was happening all the time, only we did not know it.

If we had the coordinator operating correctly for us, we would have stored up all this back information. We would have discovered whether this person was lying long ago because of little fibs that didn’t mean anything. We would know their attitude toward life by their relationships with their families, their position in business, their culture, their philosophy, their religious instincts and attitudes — all this would have told us something. But with the blanket of friendship thrown over all the evidence, when the break comes we are amazed and perturbed. We have not allowed the coordinator to have its proper function.

In order to have the best results from this intuitive structure within ourselves it is necessary for the individual to relax away from false testimonies as they first arise through his perceptions. The individual must be without prejudice, he must not distort the impulses and instincts that arise within himself. If he is able to quiet the testimony of the frontal mind, he will then allow the intuitive faculty to move into domination of the circumstance, but while he is constantly interfering he is not able to gain the assistance he needs.

All persons can be more intuitive than they are, but to be this they must take their ground firmly upon the operation of universal law and be ever observant and mindful of the various conduct patterns of those around them and the conduct patterns which are arising within themselves. Otherwise, they block the intuitional process.

One of the more common things that happens in connection with intuition is that it is likely to be most vibrant and vital while the body is at rest. This is why a large part of what we might call archetypal dreaming, dreams that have meaning, come to us from the coordinator. They come when the conscious functions of the mind are temporarily set aside. They come to us usually not as words, not as the appearance of some person, for the coordinator is not a person. They come through symbols, various forms and patterns, hunches, and sudden realizations of things which we do not normally comprehend.

We even can find this in the world of science. Where a scientist has built into the coordinator a mass of evidence, the coordinator will sort it out when his own conscious mind cannot, and as a result of this the scientist may wake some morning with the answer to the problem he has been working with for years simply because in a moment of complete repose the coordinator came through.  

We have all of this type of phenomena constantly and we pay very little conscious attention to it, but it can be very, very important. The problem of the intuitional recognition of circumstances and conditions can include, for example, an individual recognizing certain problems of his own health but not able to diagnose them. He has a feeling that something is wrong, that his health is impaired, but he cannot put his finger on what is actually wrong. Here again the coordinator is moving in to try to assist the individual.

Behind all this there might be a kind of moral issue involved. Perhaps this individual who does not feel good has for many years been violating the principles of law and health. He has been thinking badly and eating badly, and has failed to take proper care of the body. This fact is listed in the coordinator, and the coordinator can tell him at any moment just about how long he can get away with the mistakes he is making. If the man pays no attention to this warning, it becomes a prophecy, and he gradually succumbs because he has failed to remedy a situation in himself.

The same type of thing happens in family life. Family relationships become brittle and warnings come from the coordinator that unless the attitudes and relationships are changed, the family will be destroyed, it will be broken up. Some are wise enough to try to do something about it. They are harmonizing with the coordinator which is merely telling them the law relating to the subject, a law based on experience — dramatized and vitalized by ages of human testimony. If this is not heard, however, if the individual continues in his way, then whatever was the disaster that might have been, it becomes the disaster that really occurred. Also, the problem of the coordinator plays quite a part in the latter part of life where very often the coordinator first informs the individual that his physical existence is going to terminate in the near future. This may not be supported by any medical evidence, but the coordinator has available a thousand times as much information as any clinical laboratory could find or could gather. The individual’s inner life is aware of the happenings.

Also, through the five sensory perceptions we get what might be termed the historical context. We find out what has happened to others. We find out what has happened to empires, to kingdoms, to rulers, to various professions, to peoples, to class and social subjects. There is a very deep and long historical background which is called tradition. The coordinator receives from us every day some evidences of this tradition. It also is aware because of its own integrating process that tradition, like every other part of activity, is governed by laws. These laws operate, and where a new situation becomes identical with an earlier traditional situation, then similar if not identical consequences will follow.

Therefore, it is perfectly possible for the individual quietly in his own thinking and in his own reflection to realize almost prophetically the outcome of almost any situation in which he finds himself. He can also apply this to the fate of nations, to the fate of collective structures, to the rise and fall of industrial systems. All these things are basically set in patterns of infinite and immutable law. The coordinator helps the individual to adjust his own mind to these laws and gives him the final evidence, the final proof of the reality of the situation that is gradually developing.

There are times when people get hunches that do not work out. The individual, therefore, has to watch constantly to find out how much of his conclusions arise from the coordinator and how much comes from traditional habit patterns within himself. Most persons so live that their relationship to universal law is obscured. They live in a pattern in which they pay little or no attention to the great principles upon which life is built. These principles are invisible in most cases, but their consequences are painfully visible. We have to work with them every day.

At the present moment we are plunging through a mass of what the Oriental would call karma. It is a condition in which for ages we have been building contrary to the rules of the game of life. The coordinator knows this, but the individual does not pause to consider. The individual, building largely upon the satisfaction of personal selfishness and ambition, chooses to ignore those truths which might give him a better relationship with life.

We find this quite frequently in such simple and imminent circumstances as alcoholism. The average alcoholic knows that he is an alcoholic, or finds out in due time. He knows that he is playing a losing game. He knows that it will destroy all that is best in his life. Yet he will not or cannot change and, fully aware of the inevitable tragedy, he moves relentlessly toward it until finally it catches up with him. If he survives, perhaps he is a little wiser.

This type of decision to do what one pleases at the expense of doing what one should is one of the factors that blocks the intuitive faculty in the individual. We all have it because we all have behind us not only ages of personal growth but a vast universe of complex factors which subconsciously we accept, even though we may ignore them consciously.

How, then, should we start in to try to develop this intuitive faculty better than it is, so that it can serve us more efficiently when need arises? One thing we need to do is gain some form of mental honesty. This is really the beginning of the whole mystery. It is not the end, for there is more to it than honesty, but honesty is probably the most important single ingredient.

Honesty means that we must stop fooling or deceiving ourselves, especially doing this knowingly. We must gradually reduce this error factor. We must stop thinking or feeling or acting dishonestly.

This is a very large order for most people. Many do not even realize that they are dishonest. They do not believe for a moment that they have various prejudices or anything wrong with them. They have no realization that every day they are compromising principles in order to advance some personal desire. The individual wishes his own happiness first, but does most of his life working against this happiness by his conduct and his attitudes.

Intuitive people are not always merely spiritual people, but many great mystics have been also extraordinarily wise in their internal visions. Very often the prophetic power is prominent in the lives of mystics. One of the reasons is that mysticism is a doctrine of humility, it is a doctrine in which the individual steps aside and allows the truth to live through him. Mysticism is a person in a very gentle, humble, kindly, unselfish relationship with life. The mystic expects to be a servant. He is a servant of truth, a servant of God, and a servant of his fellow men regardless of his estates or dignities.

It is then natural that the mystic, by having fewer false pressures upon his life, is able to release more of the internal computerization because he is not primarily concerned with personal advantage. He is not trying to gain something for himself. He is not trying to twist facts to support his own preferences. We have, for example, in problems such as we face right now in national elections, we have all kinds of issues being pressed, advanced, sustained, and denied by the various candidates for public offices. We find also that too many of the voters are listening for that particular statement which would be of the greatest personal advantage to them. They are not thinking of the common good, but they are thinking of protecting what they have, even if it is at the expense of what they are. This common practice affects both public and private life.

Most individuals regard it as proper to live this span of life to personal advantage as far as they can. Personal advantage is very often contrary to common good and also contrary to the testimony of the computerizing factor. To escape this or at least outwit it in part, the individual must gradually release himself from attitudes which are not morally right. It’s a matter of dishonesty in many instances. It is a matter of self gratification in some; in others, advancement of career, accumulation of wealth, the desire to shine in society. These become the false reasons for life. While they dominate and their voice is heard louder than the voice of the computer, nothing much of advantage will be gained. The individual will live and pass on in a little pattern that he has created for himself. He will pass on, still striving for that which could never be his in this world or anywhere else.

Realizing this, the intuitive person is very likely to be religious. He is very likely to be a person of prayer, of meditation, a person trying desperately if necessary to live according to his high code of personal relationships with life. He is trying to overcome the tendency to animosities. He is trying to transmute old hatreds and antagonisms. He is trying to reduce as far as he can the vanities in his own life. He is entitled to anything and everything that is proper for him, but if he wishes to become a better person he must take advantage only of the better opportunities that arise. Otherwise, he will ultimately short-circuit his own life.

If he can begin to reduce these artificial decisions that he makes simply on the basis of the sensory perceptions without coordination, if he will gradually learn to discriminate the laws behind action, he will begin to develop a stronger intuitional faculty.

The Buddhist holds strongly to a meditative concept. Buddhism was originally a moral and ethical system and it was gradually expanded to become what has been called in Asia “the heart doctrine.” It is the doctrine that the final solution to all things is compassion. The individual must base his foundations upon a gentle release from the tendencies to cruelty of any kind. The Bodhisattva doctrine is the doctrine of infinite self-sacrifice for the common good. It is the doctrine of the individual forgetting his own advancements in the service of humanity. It is completely noncompetitive.

Competition becomes the basis of delusion, for competition itself is a delusion. Nothing will ever be solved by it because it is constantly destroying the basic friendships, the basic kinships which should exist in human society.

Intuition, therefore, comes mostly to those who by nature have chosen to follow a faith or a spiritual path of growth. These people do develop a strong sense of faith. Faith is dependency upon truth. It may be also called a dependency upon God because, in the highest analysis, God is truth. It is the individual aligning himself with Divine Purpose, striving sincerely to keep those spiritual realities which are set forth in THE SERMON ON THE MOUNT and in the many wonderful teachings of the Christian religion.

Here we have something that is contrary to human attitudes but, unfortunately for man, is in perfect accord with the laws of existence. We are told in the words of the masters that “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” God’s meek are those who quietly and gently accept the Universal Plan. They are the ones who strive definitively every day to keep the rules, fully aware that the rules will keep them. Quieting down, taking the humble spot, waiting quietly for the good that is deserved — these people quickly ripen their intuition. They become very wise in the inner life of things.

In olden days there was in every family an honored elder. Very often it was grandmother, sometimes grandfather or an aged maiden aunt, but there was always someone in the family who was the counselor. When problems became difficult or situations were hard to bear, the elder was called upon to advise, to tell, to explain, to speak from the experience of long years that which was best in the present emergency. In man’s compound constitution, this elder is the coordinator. It is that which speaks with the wisdom of ages against the foolishness of the moment and points out those great strengths upon which survival depends.

In our present generation we have lost contact with most of the securities of the past. We have lost our ability to simply listen to the wisdom of the elders. The American Indian listened to the words of the “olds” and the “truths”. We listen mostly to superficial remarks made by those seldom qualified to speak at all. In other words, we have lost the counselor — the old teacher. We have lost Gurnemanz in the story of Parsifal. We have lost the guide that would take us through the underworld of uncertainty as in the story of Dante being led by Virgil through the underworld. We have lost the leadership and guidance of counsel. We are dependent entirely now upon the contemporary pressure of events and we regard anything that is not immediate as out of focus. We are not able to benefit even by the lessons of our own country. We are not able to benefit by the unhappiness in the lives of our own parents. We go on the same way. We cannot recognize that the parent in us, the old aunt and the grandmother in us speaking with the wisdom of years, is the coordinator.

It is that which, out of the facts of living distills the pattern which each individual must follow. From this coordinator the person can learn how he must change himself. He learns how he can expand and develop the potentials that he possesses, how he can be more useful and serviceable to the causes of others around him. He learns better habits of living. He finds the mistake of decadent morality. He learns many, many things, not from old grandmother or grandfather but from this ancient one within himself, the teacher, the wise one, the oracle, that mysterious power which, if it can be brought into our objective attention, has the answers to everything that we need to know.

This is true on every level — social, individual, collective, for in this computerizing process the individual is stripped of all of his superficial embellishments and various attitudes. He is forced in himself to see himself, to know himself, and to act in accordance with the needs of himself. There is no concealment or evasion possible; the facts are all there, but there are not too many who are able to face these facts and not too many who even want to know that they exist. We want to go on our own way.

Every civilization and culture of the world has brought forth its prophets. The prophets of the Old Testament, the patriarchs, the apostles, the world teachers, the great reformers, the great leaders — these persons were actually outstanding examples of the possibility of bringing the coordinator into objective manifestation. Wherever these prophets spoke in the Bible, we are told that they spoke upon the authority of God. The authority of God is the authority of truth, and the authority of truth arises from the individual’s achievement of a basic factual existence within himself.

Truth is for each person the truth of himself. The truth for every civilization is merely the statement of the laws governing that civilization, and the inevitable consequences of action — constructive and destructive. The prophets in the scriptures warned the kings and the princes of the fall of their empires. They warned individuals of the sorrows and miseries of their personal corruptions. And many times these prophets were heavily punished by those who did not want to know the truth. In ourselves when an unhappy or unpleasant truth presents itself we are apt to punish it rather than ourselves, we do not want to face these things but until we face them we cannot develop and perfect the instrument which we possess.

This body is a magnificent instrument. It is far greater than we even suspect with all our researches and studies. It is something that man will never be able to equal by mechanical means. No matter how far he advances computerization he can never achieve what is achieved within the person himself, for this computer in us is alive.

It is not merely machines and tapes and mathematical formulas but a living computerization of action. It is a living, constant expression of all of the needs and requirements of the person. It makes possible for him the complete reestablishment of his own life, but he has to call upon it.

Many mystics in their meditations — like Boehme or Eckhart — felt that God spoke to them, that in some mysterious way the Holy Spirit descended upon them. The Holy Spirit and this mysterious inner voice, this mysterious power which gave an accuracy to every thought and made every statement a revelation, was actually derived from this computerization process within human consciousness itself. This does not mean that God is not in the business; it means that actually this whole computerization process is a divine process. It is a process not based upon materialism but upon the exploration of the spiritual potential of the human being.

Another factor that may help the average person to be more intuitive is the Pythagorean discipline of retrospection. Here at the end of each day the person sits down and studies his own day. He analyzes and examines every single thing that had any meaning whatever in his procedures. He is especially mindful of his own reactions to the various challenges of the day.

Was he annoyed by the phone call? Was he disturbed by the visitor who dropped in? Was he unable to stand the prattle of the children? Did he have one or more problems that he had been wanting to take care of and he was interrupted?

In each case, what was his reaction? Did he accept these things or did he resent them? Did he resent them because they interfered with the common good or because they interfered with what he wanted to do? Were these objects of resentment worthy of resentment? Were they things he should have accepted and understood? Did they ruffle him to the expenditure of vital energy so that he wasted life as well as time? Was he able to quietly and peacefully move through confusions, through dissonances? Was he able to keep the truths of life very bright under the small irritations which are apt to disturb us?

If he finds himself to be brittle or sharp; if he finds himself to be inclined to nag or to escape and if caught in a mistake to try to deny it, or still further try to prove that the mistake was right — all these things represent attitudes of the mind, and these attitudes are detrimental to the achievement of an intuitive understanding of life. Unless the channels are kept open to that which is better than we are, we will remain as we are, and that is not good enough.

So we can watch these little details every day and begin quietly correcting the weaknesses in ourselves. Did we have a splurge of extravagance we should not have splurged? Did we buy things that were useless? Did we allow vanity to involve us in debt?

All of these things are recorded in the coordinator. There is not one single detail of attitude that is not the effect of a cause and the cause of an effect, and that which we do in a moment of indecision or indiscretion we must face in the future. Reduce, therefore, as far as possible, all attitudes which are inconsistent with peace of mind, inconsistent with integrities. If it is necessary to defend a principle, we will defend it to the end, but if we try merely to defend an opinion we may all be in trouble.

So we gradually move the foundation of life from the passing effects of the moment to the solid foundations of principles. Principles must operate. They must guide us and direct us.

As we gradually relax away from wasting energy and time in purposes and circumstances that are meaningless, we can quiet down some of this restless spirit that perturbs us all. We can be quiet, we can weigh all things, we can be like an honest judge upon the bench whose decision is to be based upon truth only — upon true evidence, and never upon gossip, hearsay, or unsupported claims. If we can sit in quiet judgment of our own lives — not that we wish to mete out a terrible punishment upon ourselves, but rather we want to know ourselves as we really are and upon that basis to improve ourselves in every way possible.

As we become more thoughtful, we know that true thoughtfulness gradually ties in with the mental coordinator. The more thoughtful we become, the more the coordinator works in our daily life. When we get rid of thoughtlessness, then the true type of thought can begin to operate and the mental coordinator will enable us to plan our lives to the very end at any moment that we wish to do so. It can also show us why we are, where we are, and what we are today. It can gradually move us from a career of accidents to a career of purposed endeavors, because as this coordinator operates a light shine inside of us. It is this light within which truly breaks through to become what we would term “intuition”. It is the light of the truth in ourselves, garnered from the experiences of ourselves, regenerated by the dedications of ourselves — these are the factors that make it possible for the individual to have the experience of truth, truth being the basic factor in the experience of intuition.

Intuition is the revelation of the thing as it is, not the thing as we wish it was, or hope it will be, or afraid it can possibly become. All this is part of illusion, but intuition is a light of certainty arising from the most perfect processes of computerization that the individual can imagine, and far beyond, but it is all in the substance of life itself. It is not made of steel, it is not worked by a current passed through it. It is a part of our own eternal, living organism.

The mind is still the greatest mystery that man must face because in all of his thinking he thinks away from himself and not towards the source of thinking in himself. He is unaware of how to build gradually mental competence. He has experiences, but he misjudges them. He goes through critical situations, but blames others for them. He faces general social disorders, but cannot mend his own defects. All these things block intuition, block clear vision of any kind, and under this benightedness it drifts with the current of things from one disaster to another.

If we can bring the coordinator into focus we will discover that we are better people than we have ever known ourselves to be. We are also wiser. Ignorance is on the surface of things; wisdom is innate. The illusions of matter annoy the five senses, but the sixth sensory coordinator cannot be deceived by them. The realities are always available within the individual. He cannot be finally taught entirely from the outside. He gains valuable evidence, but this evidence passing through consciousness makes itself available to him as a great code of conduct, a way of life which leads to life everlasting. The mental coordinator, giving us this testimony, ensures us of the final achievement of any constructive end which we hope to attain. This coordinator goes with us. This coordinator will direct us in the infinite future as it directed us in the past, and gradually the power of this coordinator is made manifest through its consequences.

We have people around us sometimes who, through a lifetime of association, we have really learned to trust. There are people whom we know to be good. There are people whose every action and every conviction is worthy of our respect. These types of people, to a certain degree, represent the powers or factors within ourselves. Our own inner imagination and inner emotions are essentially good. Our own natural thought processes are good and they are reasonable, but because of lack of discrimination and discipline we are not able to follow the dictates of true thinking.

We use the mind as an instrument of selfishness when it should be the instrument of enlightenment. But the good friend in ourselves, the coordinator, is never going to cease to be a good friend. It will be a better friend life after life as we learn more about the laws of living. It will be with us until its work is completed. It will be a kind of guardian angel over us throughout all our existences. It is that thing within ourselves which cannot be destroyed, perverted, nor indefinitely ignored.

Little by little the inner takes victory over the external. Gradually the sensory perceptions become the instruments to bear witness to the integrity of life, whereas now they principally reveal to us the inconsistencies of mortal activity. The coordinator goes on to be with us until finally we develop an internal life in which the intuition of reality becomes part of our nature. Instead of being a faculty submerged, it will become the guiding and dominating law of our existence, because the coordinator will finally take over and in so doing will make it virtually impossible for the individual to make any very serious mistake.

In the meantime, while he is struggling and torn between his own moral integrities and the amoral society in which he lives, each person has to work this out for himself. He has to find his own values and stay with them. The beginning of this is honesty because until he is honest he will not choose that which is honest. As long as he believes in compromise, he will compromise, but the coordinator is constantly bringing him evidence that compromise is fatal — that he cannot win by anything except integrity. The only way he can abide in the grace of God is by obeying the will of God and this will is represented through the laws of existence. If we keep these laws then we worship correctly. It is not what we name the Deity but how we live according to its principles that becomes the vital and important factor.

If, then, we want to really learn, if we want to try to develop this intuition, we should devote some time to good reading, to study those kinds of texts which inspire us to live better lives — not the type of text that has compromise built into it, not a text which will cause us to assume that we are independent of the absolute responsibility of life. It should never read evasion literature, how to get out of doing what is right, or how to allow self will to build a fortune for us, this is not the type; but serious and thoughtful things which inspire us strongly and meditatively to the expression of our integrities.

One of the principles of the ancient oracles of Greece was that the gods always spoke in verse. Prose was the language of mortals; poetry the language of the immortals, and many very great works in poetry have tremendous moral and spiritual qualities. In some mysterious way poets are more often given to intuition than those in other more intellectual or scientific fields of endeavor. Poetry is a very good source of inspirational insights.

In our daily conduct we can try as much as we can to keep all of those rules which we are taught to be indispensable. One of the great rules is that the individual should avoid luxury. He should avoid things which bind him to the earth. He should avoid the process of building up a standard of living when he should be trying to build a standard of life. He should be moderate in all things. He should be interested in the common good. He should be neighborly and friendly. He should try to hold the confidence of his children. He should do everything possible in his own way to help others to live according to a code of personal integrity. By setting an example of this and by sharing this wisdom with others, the individual also discovers that the more he gives of wisdom, the more he has. When giving good counsel, the individual in forgetting himself often releases intuition.

I have noticed on many occasions that an individual comparatively uninformed, when asked to help to advise a person in deep trouble, a very humble person will give advice that the greatest philosopher could not equal. This is because in a state of very simple service and affection and friendship we release ourselves from the tyranny of personal attitudes. When we are trying to help another we probably help ourselves most of all, but we do not even know it. And we could not perhaps probably live what we have advised the other person to do, and this is one reason why we have to watch the coordinator because the moment we advise the individual to a certain cause of life we must ask ourselves whether or not we need the same advice, and if we do need it perhaps it is come to us through this intuitional flash when we try to help someone else. Watch the intuitional releases as they come along. Whenever you feel a very definite sense that something is wrong, try to find out why. Try to find out what testimonies bear upon this matter. Do not blame other people because we are all subject to law and when another person breaks the law that is his problem. When we break it it is ours. When we both break it it is war and this has been our problem for many ages.

Always in simple, quiet, meditational ways we try to visualize the integrities of life. We sense within our own depths this power that is forever building upon our experience. If that was not true, what good would the experience be? What value would life have unless it was a record of growing? In some mysterious way everything that happens has to happen to bring about the most necessary improvements of living creatures. If it was not for this, what value would we place upon anything? Why be born, why grow and suffer, why age and die, if it has no meaning except in terms of this little shadow in which we live?

That out in space and everywhere else there is nothing but some vast blind force moving and this blind force pushes us and pulls us from one inconsistency into another. Such a life is inconceivable. Such a plan could not be implied as arising in a divine being. If the Lord of it all is all-wise, all-knowing, and all-good, then the plan must be for the greater good. There is a reason for everything that happens, and that reason is to help us to grow. The moment something happens we must try to understand by quiet thoughtfulness how this is going to help us to grow, how it is going to bring us nearer to the full purpose for which we were created. If we can quietly contemplate this in peace and without any evasions or excuses, and try to understand prayerfully and in mystical contemplation the reason for that one little incident that happened today, we may find in that instance the flash of intuition. We will suddenly know why it happened. Then the sky will close again.

Plotinus, the great mystic, said that only on two occasions did he receive the direct impression of his God. This direct impression was a revelation of character. It was instruction as to what to do and how to do it, and it was in this sense of the word a clear expression of the intuitional power. When we need intuition we will have it. If we have it a little already, it will grow, but to make it grow we must listen to it, obey its counsel, and verify that it is really intuition and not simply self-interest masquerading under a spiritual appearance. We must test the spirits, we must try to find out and observe whether the things we intuit actually come to pass. If they do, and very often they will, then we must become more and more dependent upon that mood, that quality of life which opens the link between ourselves and the record of our greater selves.

In other words, we must go back into the stacks and find the records, we must go back into the mental coordinator and we'll finally discover through this what is next for us and how it is best that we can gain the desired end. Actually, intuition is only the availability of all that we have been through, all that we have experienced, all that we have thought, and every deed we have performed. All this together makes a pattern, and this pattern gives us the most valuable of all advice: what we must do next. All that has gone before is being culminated now, and every facility, faculty, and power that we possess is being focused upon the next problem that each of us must face.

If we are very careful in our daily conduct to cater to that type of intuition which invites us to be bigger than we are in spirit, quality, and conduct — if the intuition impels us to grow, it is good. If it attempts to tell us how to escape growth, then we must suspect that the mind has taken over and that the frontal thinking is obscuring the basic facts. The frontal thinking deals with things of today; the computer in ourselves deals in terms of forever. In that computer the incidents of the day are simply part of the great collective experience which we call life, and in this computerizing process all that we have been is available to help us to become better today. All that we achieve today will be available to us in the future as we go along the path of life.

Adversity very often strengthens intuition. Suffering and sorrow remind us that we have to find a reason for them, and after a while we can no longer blame them upon society, we can no longer blame them upon friends and enemies. We have to come face to face with the fact that our life is the result of the degree of inner insight that we are able to focus upon the issues of the present day. As we grow in that dimension of feeling, as we become more conscious of this process, our intuition will enlarge accordingly. We will find that intuition, the growth of it, is merely the revelation of it — that which is coming through, making available to us what we must know next in order to grow according to the archetypal pattern by which we were created.

Intuition is a very wonderful thing, but it is a reward, it is a fruit, it is a harvest of the individual’s dedications, achievements, longings, yearnings, and his desire to understand his true place in the Divine Plan of things. When he achieves to this he will find that this intuitive faculty, like the old teacher, will be more and more available and will assist him constantly in the fulfillment of himself. It is because this old teacher actually is also himself, the submerged part that he no longer remembers. Sometime everything that has been secret shall be made known, and everything that is hidden shall come to light. When we realize that and gain the understanding of it, then we realize that the intuitive power will ultimately reveal to us all that is our real selves.


13 травня 2022 р.

Satori: the Awakening of Intuitive Understanding

(Transcript by Tob Hawk)

It has always seemed to me that Japanese systems of thought such as Zen and Bushido, things of that quality, are approached differently from our way of creating what we might term "authority". The oriental technique of teaching is not the clarification of an attitude toward a subject, but a coaxing of the student into the experiencing of extensions of consciousness for himself. Thus perhaps, while we have the term "Satori", which definitely signifies the development or release of the intuitive understanding of the individual, the term has almost as many meanings as it has students. Instead therefore of a very formal study based upon an acceptance or rejection of the authority of certain persons, the entire concept rides along upon a very gentle current, the current of what does it mean to us, how can we use these ideas in the strengthening and developing of our own way of life.

Therefore this morning we're going to take the attitude of what Satori can mean to us. Not what it meant to a Japanese or a Japanese teacher or professor, but what it means to us now, for that is the spirit of it. The spirit of it is universal, and every effort is made to prevent this universality from being locked within a creed or a dogma or even a discipline.

The emphasis is upon the person doing something himself. This is very difficult for Western man particularly on the level of beliefs. We are so used to being told what to think, we are so used to having certain programs presented, ready for acceptance or rejection, that we do not take very seriously the idea that we should evolve or create programs for ourselves.

Now a few years ago, for example, an ingenious person with a pen knife and some wood could whittle out or carve an infinite variety of pleasant interesting or amusing devices. We have almost given this up. We no longer do this. What we now do is buy a kit, in which all we have to do is paste the parts together. They're all cut out for us. We know before we start what we're going to finish with, all the thinking is done for us. Therefore, the creativity is taken out of the project.

Now, this has something to do with the subject of the morning: the problem of restoring creativity to our search for understanding, which we are all more or less in need of enlarging and improving and increasing in connection with daily living.

Now, most persons in the West and in the East also have certain basic convictions upon which they can build if they so desire. One of these convictions is that within the individual, in the core of our own personal existence, there is a spiritual or divine equation. That man moves outward from this core of his own divinity and in the course of moving outward this divinity is obscured. Obscured by the sensory perceptions, by the functions of the body, finally by the body itself. Later whatever impulse may come out through body is further obscured or diluted by contact with environment and the conflicts of daily living.

But we do have this belief: namely that there is a divinity within us and that this divinity represents the best part of ourselves. It is the true core of our being. Now, your concept of understanding implies that this divine root within us is essentially true, is essentially correct and that impulses coming directly from it are essentially good. This means that man possesses within himself the positive pole of understanding, this positive pole being his own divine nature. Any operation which is in accordance with this divine nature must be true, and the discoveries which this nature makes in its investigation of life around it must be essentially correct. How does it follow then that a human being with a god at the root of himself, can be so distinctly deficient in god-like attributes when it comes to daily living? The answer of course in the east is the traditional and familiar one: that man does not give this divine part the right of expression, that he locks it, and that he imposes upon his own divinity a very heavy barrier of humanities, of material, physical, personal things. And as a result of this uses his divine energy largely merely to energise and not to understand the world in which he lives.

If therefore there be a reality within man and this reality is divine, we cannot factually add to or really detract from this divinity. The god in man does not need to be educated. It does not have to be saved. It does not have to be sent to school. The god in man exists in a state of eternal knowing, true knowing. Why this divine part is not able to dominate and control that compound over which it is supposed to preside, gives us the very source of the psychology of Buddhism. This struggle between the divine internal and the intellectual doubts, opinions, fears, superstitions of the personality.

Understanding, if we are to find it then, is not something to be gained by culture essentially. We do not gain understanding merely by educational means, nor do we do so by putting understanding under discipline. What we must actually do is to remove from our natures in so far as possible that which is not understanding and that which is antipathetical to understanding. We must therefore educate ourselves out of our mistakes. We do not have to educate ourselves into our virtues. That which remains when we stop making mistakes is the truth. This truth is not something that has to be unfolded, has to be enriched, has to be cultivated. What we have to do is to get rid of that which is not so, that which in its ordinary purposes is inadequate.

Now, how can we tell with certainty, what is so and what is not so? The Bible tells us that "by their work so shall ye know them", and this is very largely the Eastern position also. That which does not accomplish good is in this fact alone not so, in the largest meaning of the term. We are not taking the position that evil is non-existent in the world of our physical functions — things do go wrong, we do have beliefs that do not help. But in the East the term “truth”, or “reality”, has a much larger meaning. A thing can happen and not be essentially right, or "so", in the largest meaning of this concept. So when we are looking for some guide by which we can direct conduct, we know that that which is itself good, must ever produce the likeness of itself. Good is not the cause of evil; joy, real joy is not the cause of sorrow; virtue is not the cause of vice. These virtues, these positive good things, produce according to their own kind. Therefore that which in itself produces discord and trouble, is not in itself good. The energy perhaps is divine, but the use or abuse of that energy causes it to contribute to trouble or difficulty rather than to harmony and security.

Therefore in our daily conduct we know that such actions, thoughts or words, as do not contribute to good, in some way lock our own understanding. Result in our being divided from the inspiration which contact with life should bestow.

So we look around us, we begin to estimate the various practices and policies which dominate our conduct. Our first question perhaps in the spirit of Satori is - are we happy? Are we actually satisfied with our own internal life? This does not mean “are we perfect”, nor does it mean that we should say to ourselves “I cannot be happy until I am perfect”. We have relative degrees of happiness. Today in modern thinking we term "adjusted" perhaps to represent that state in which our internal resources are sufficient to our immediate external or environmental needs. When we say “Are we happy?” therefore perhaps we mean “Are we content?”. Is our home a well-managed institution? As family are we close and harmonious and understanding? Are we quick of sympathy and slow of criticism? Are we reasonably patient? Do we really seek to understand the person who injures us or are we quick to seek revenge? Do we accept life with graciousness and regardless of what occurs to us do we continuously apperceive or apprehend the good that is everywhere present? Are we free from illusions and are we also free from disillusionment? Are we able to accept the problems of the day with good grace? Are we worrying? Are we fearful? Have we unreasonable doubts about Providence? Are we nursing grudges? Are we jealous? And further and perhaps more important to most persons — are we healthy? Are we enjoying a maximum of physical vitality for our condition and our age bracket? Are we able to feel that our energies are being used constructively? Are we lonely? Can we say or do we say to ourselves “I have no important reason for existing”? Are we simply sitting around, waiting for something to turn up? Are we constantly complaining against the situations around us? Are we seeking to shift responsibility for our own conduct to other persons? Do we gossip? Are we lazy? Are we quick to misunderstand the intentions of others? Have we rejected ordinary daily responsibilities because they were not sufficiently glamorous? Are we using our religion and our philosophy to escape life or to fulfill life?

All these questions we have to ask and out of our honest answers must come a certain measure of personal analysis. If any large number of these problems we cannot find that we have met constructively, then we are in need of understanding. We are in need of strengthening these internal resources, because just to the degree that we misunderstand anything, we are between ourselves and our own truth. And every form of misunderstanding leads to some kind of conflict, discord, pain or sorrow. As good cannot lead to these ends, the individual who assumes that he is always right but who in his own personal living is seldom happy, such a person cannot be right. And as it is very important for most individuals to assume that they are right, we have a very difficult and ludicrous situation, immediately obvious to other people but not obvious to ourselves: namely we are right and miserable. This cannot factually be. Because right based upon morality is a victory and a victory is a foundation for a sense of accomplishment of true victory, of well-being. If therefore a moral, intellectual or ethical victory brings with it no adequate consolation and does not make us larger than the problem we have overcome, we have no victory. We have achieved nothing. So we must continue our eternal search for understanding, realizing that herein lies the secret of our own security.

In the search for understanding the average person is not too well equipped. There has been very little emphasis upon this in his social system. His education has not equipped him to meet such challenge as this. Therefore actually he has to create instruments for the attainment of understanding within himself. To many persons this seems like a prodigious task, but nature does not require that we have highly specialized and difficult to acquire systems of culture in order to be happy or to be right.

Most persons who achieve happiness have discovered that it comes through a very simple procedure available to all. We are not really unhappy because of lack of opportunity to grow or to understand but through the misuse of opportunity, through the failure to recognize the importance of simple facts, always available to us and within the understanding of the most humble intellect. It is simply failure to use properly, it is failure to keep common sense rules, which we all broadly accept and apply to other persons but not ourselves.

Then understanding in the Oriental thinking is that which is left or that which remains when everything which is contrary to it gradually disappears. So when man attempts a head-on collision with his own temperament he is also likely to get into trouble. A person who has been for a quarter of a century subject to instinctive attacks of jealousy, finds it very difficult to suddenly stop being jealous. The chronic worrier finds that he worries whether he intends to or not. By degrees he has lost control of the power to control worry. The chronic angry person who has poor control of his emotions finds that after a lifetime of temperfits that it is not easy to suddenly smooth out and have a fine, noble, well-balanced disposition.

The reason why we have so much difficulty in overcoming ourselves is because we fight this battle on the level of our own misunderstanding. We simply say to ourselves, "I'm sorry, I shouldn't have a temper like this". But when we say what we say we do not mean what we say. Actually, the only reason why we have the bad temper is because we basically enjoy it. We want to have it more than we want to get over having it, because man will always follow his most dynamic desire. When he really desires something he will get it if it is humanly within his reach or means, and I have watched persons who have long range plans of things they want and they will patiently go on for years, until they finally accomplish that which they most want to accomplish. And if the desire is strong enough they will never give up.

Now, anyone with a desire of that intensity could change any dispositional characteristic that he has. The individual will work 14-16 hours a day, seven days a week to achieve some economic end or to attain some popularity or distinction. Could if he wished to make any conceivable change in his own disposition. But his desire for this change is not great enough. Usually he does not wish to change his temperament, because in some way what he is doing, whether it be right or wrong, is giving gratification to himself. He has certain instincts and he will cling to the code which will permit him to express these instincts. He has a sharp temper, therefore he will not overcome the physical outbursts which are really expressions of exactly the way he feels, and he gains a strong personal satisfaction in telling other people what he thinks of them. This is so pleasant to him that he has no intention of changing his policy. He might realize that he should, just as the alcoholic realizes that he should not be an alcoholic, but his desire not to be is not as strong as his desire to gratify his own attitudes and instincts. This is what we have with personality defects: that these defects please us in some way, they satisfy us, they help us to get something out of our systems, and of course we have now given this procedure a psychological pedigree. It has now been blessed as a sanctified procedure by "saint Freud" and several others. (Laugh) We are told that the time when we feel like exploding we should explode. Because in so doing we let off steam, we reduce pressure, and while we may become obnoxious to everyone, we are achieving a great benefit in ourselves.

I doubt this very seriously, because the penalty for lack of self-control is greater than any possible advantages that may come from it. The individual who permits his bad disposition to alienate him from his friends, break his family and cause him to fail in business, is presented with so many problems that it is very doubtful if his internal life is brought to any kind of equilibrium by a bad disposition. He will probably become more and more embittered until no psychologist can do anything for him. Actually, it would be wiser to say that the individual is born with certain responsibilities to himself, and among these responsibilities is to a measure the civilization of himself, the bringing of his own life within the control of his own consciousness, not by forcing some kind of an arbitrary code on him, but by realizing the potential possibility of his own nature. So understanding is something which is his birthright, he is entitled to it, and because nature has equipped him to attain it, nature undoubtedly expects him to attain it and will penalize him until he does.

To find then the adequate means for understanding, means some kind of a basic point of view, not a creed, not a code, but the acceptance of a principle, a working pattern for a kind of achievement. Now, before we can accept any code dynamically, we must be able to truly believe it. That is one of our difficulties in the world today: we have many wonderful codes which people accept, but not dynamically. They do not accept these codes to the degree that they live by them. They affirm them, but they violate them in their own personal conduct, and as a result these codes do not accomplish their common social ends, which would be such things as peace, world peace, the outlawing of war, the man's correction of the problems of crime and delinquency.

But we do not live these codes, therefore we do not enjoy the securities which they might bring to us. So we have to have a code that is essentially within our comprehension, and in the Orient there is one simple doctrine that helps us to attain this, and that is the idea that any principle that we need to live with we can prove and justify within a few minutes in our own conduct now. We do not have to believe in revelations from some ancient deity. We can gain the insight for right living and for right decision by the mere contemplative observation of life around us.

Now, in the problem of understanding we have a good example we can work with, an example that is common to all of us. We observe some person and through gesture, action or word that person offends us. We declare them to be wrong. But perhaps we are friendly enough, or kindly enough, in our basic attitudes that somewhere along the line we let this person explain himself. We let him tell us why he took the attitude that he did, and it may very well be that we suddenly agree with him. We suddenly see why we were wrong in our judgment. If we are at all open-minded, if we are at all tolerant, if we are in any way in the spirit of our constitution and our declaration of independence and our bill of rights, we will ultimately give this other person credit when we understand him.

We usually got into trouble, in the first place, because of a hasty judgment. We took some symptom and magnified it beyond its merit. We took some emergency in his life and judged it incorrectly. Coming gradually however to know this person better, we suddenly realized that he was not an evil being as we first imagined but perhaps merely a troubled individual like ourselves; and discovering our own likeness in him, we suddenly began to have sympathy for him and perhaps might even go so far as to apologize — half-heartedly — for what we had previously said. We hate to admit we are wrong — but occasionally we will gather up all our resources and achieve a martyrdom in this respect. But we know every day that we observe something and that the observation is not according to the fact.

Buddha tells us of the man who looking down on the path saw what he thought was a dead stick in the road. He stepped on it, it was a serpent, and it bit him. Another man walking down the road saw what he believed to be a serpent and was greatly frightened, only to discover later that it was a dead stick. All of these problems have to do with our immediate interpretation of something. The quick look causes symbolical associations to bring us to false conclusions in many cases. So we observe that hasty judgment, judgment without thought, without true observation. To pass judgment upon one thing while our mind is on something else is not fair or reasonable.

So by degrees we strive for reasonable simple answers to this search for understanding. One of the things we come upon immediately is that in order to understand anything we've got to give it attention. Nothing which we do not even pay attention to can be truly and completely understood or appreciated. It's like the individual reading his newspaper at breakfast while someone is talking to him. To the degree his mind is on the newspaper he will not fully understand what is being said to him, and to the degree he listens to the person speaking he will be unable to read the newspaper thoroughly. Man therefore cannot do two things at one time and do them well, especially if these two require individual creative conscious thoughtfulness. The musician may be able to train both hands — but he does so by long habitual exercise and by a gradually developing subconscious control over them. But in our daily conscious experience anything that requires understanding requires attention. Attention means that the full resource of our thoughtfulness and our understanding must be devoted to the subject on hand.

Thoughtfulness, attention, concentration of effort. If a thing is worth understanding at all, it is worth understanding completely.

Thus the learning to direct attention, to really put ourselves into the work, giving of our own time and energy sufficient to make sure that our judgment is sound — now, there is no need to do this. There is absolutely no need for us to sit around by the hour giving our attention to something. This must be a choice of our own. But if we do not do this we have no right, spiritual, moral or legal, to pass judgment on anything. Our right to judge is based completely upon the labor of attained understanding. That upon which we wish to confer only a passing moment, or that which we consider only in terms of preconception, or in terms of tradition, or by some formula that does not involve our own conscious attention. Anything so neglected or so cast aside without thought, we should not judge, nor should we have any opinion on it, nor should we communicate to others any opinion about it. We should never have any opinion except a thorough one, and we should never have any judgment except that which is based upon the full experience of the fact. The moment we recognize this duty and this responsibility we begin to see where we've made a lot of mistakes.

Now, presuming for a moment that we have decided to give some matter which seems to be of considerable importance: the time necessary to do it well. This brings up an emergency in the life of modern man: the scarcity of time. The average person has not too much time at his disposal; therefore he must decide the proper use of time and here comes discrimination which is an essential element in understanding.

If, however, a particular subject is not worth ten hours of investigation in the hope of solving it, then it is not worth five minutes of argument or complaint, because it isn't solved. A subject which is not worth solving is not worth complaining about afterward, which is the common cause. I have known persons who have come for advice who are free to admit that they did not take the time or trouble to spend one hour in the effort to solve a problem, but they have worried, feared, hated and grudged over it for 20 years afterwards. They had no time for the constructive research, but they had plenty of time to allow themselves to gossip, and to worry, and to spread unpleasant word and thought about the matter for half a lifetime.

If it is not worth investigating properly then it is not worth worrying about at all. We have to decide what we're going to do with energy and there is no greater waste of it than the use of it in circulating unfair and ill-digested ideas.

So if we are going to do the problem at all we have to face another issue which is typically Oriental. How are we going to use the life that we do have? The purpose of living is that man shall understand, and every problem that arises which challenges understanding is important because it is for this reason man exists. Man does not exist to pay bills, or to make a career, or to run a nation. Man exists primarily to attain understanding, and all the other things that he gains through understanding or through the experiences of life are byproducts. Success is a byproduct, but not a purpose for life. Understanding is a purpose for life, The Purpose. And an individual is entirely wrong who says to himself “I can allow twenty years of life in order to be a success, but I cannot spend two hours to sit down and find out why I'm having a feud with my enemy”.

The solution to the problem of human antagonism is more important in the life development and consciousness of the human being than the accumulation of a hundred million dollars, because the 100 million dollars can still leave the individual with such a bad condition in his stomach, that like one multi-millionaire he had to live on milk toast for the last 20 years of his life.

The problem of finding the answer is important. If it is not important to find the answer, then it is not important to circulate false answers. If we have not been able to solve the problem of our relationship with others, then we have no reason to become antisocial and turn upon these other persons with criticism and condemnation.

We do so at a great waste of energy about which we will find nothing good accumulating, for all these antagonisms lead only to the further destruction of our own health and happiness. If however it should occur that we need further understanding of some situation, what is the end by which this understanding is most easily attained? This end must always arise from receptivity.

We have two attitudes taught everything. The more common is for us to impose ourselves or our opinions upon others. Most instances, if we were asked to give a clear description of another person, we would ultimately describe ourselves, because we would impose upon that other person every characteristic and trait with which we were most concerned. If we liked that person, he would have our virtues. If we disliked that person, he would have the qualities which are most unpleasant to us. His highest virtue would be that he is like us. His greatest vice — that he is not like us. In his conduct if his actions improve our conditions, he is our friend. If his actions improve his conditions at our expense, he is our enemy.

Always we measure by terms of ourselves, and if he is a mysterious person, and everyone has a stratum of mystery in them somewhere, the moment we are unable to understand this person we assume that he is going to do what we expect him to do, to think as we expect him to think and we impose upon his inner motivations all motives, ulterior or otherwise, with which we require him to be invested. So we really have no knowledge whatever of the other person.

Sometimes we will say, I've heard people say many times that they are infallible at judging others. The only reason why they are infallible is because they accept only the evidence which they wish to accept and give the other person no opportunity for rebuttal. Therefore continue to affirm that they are right. Most infallible people are also miserable, because no one is to that degree infallible.

The second way of finding out something is to keep quiet and let the thing tell you, and for the American people this is difficult. (Laugh) At keeping quiet we are a dismal failure with the perhaps the exception of a small group of quakers and other sects that practice quietude. The reason why we do not really like to keep quiet and let other people unfold themselves to us is because essentially we do not have very much interest in other people. The moment they say something it reminds us of ourselves — and off we go. We are much more interested in talking than in listening, although the old Chinese proverb says that we should only speak one half as much as we listen, and to prove that God gave us two ears but only one tongue. (Laugh) Incidentally, in the course of time, however, the tongue has become mightier than both ears (laugh), and when we do listen there's nothing we enjoy listening to more than our own tongue. We get a kind of a little closed corporation working in this situation. (Laugh)

The good listener is able to come probably nearer to truth and understanding than any other individual. Good listening does a great good to the other person frequently to be able to tell his story, and it does us much more good to listen to him explain himself than to try and explain himself to him. Also when we tell him how he thinks he may disagree with us, and quite rightly, but we are much more sure of our opinion than we are of him so we keep right on, and I know many people who have already decided how everyone else in the world thinks, and you can never undeceive them although they are wrong.

So we learn the Oriental method which is present everywhere in the simplest part of life. The attitude of the Eastern mind in the search for understanding is not to be negative but to be receptive. Now, there's a difference: to be negative means to just let other people flow in and drown you; to be receptive means to accept their thought as coming from them and subject it quietly to the rational processes of our own consciousness. Receptivity is therefore the definite effort to take a non-prejudiced attitude, a fair attitude.

Now, it does not follow that when we have listened and heard and thought that we must agree with the other person. It does not follow that the other person may be any more right in a particular matter than we are or any less right. The point is that if we can get certain perspective on these matters we come to a new basis of relationships: namely the democracy of both persons being partly wrong, which is a very important foundation. One of the good virtues of this particular situation is that when one person is right and the other person is wrong and that's it, even a marriage counselor can do very little good, the home is gone.

But where both persons are a little right and a little wrong, both persons have jobs, each one has the privilege of helping the other. If one person demands the right to help but refuses the other person the right to help also, we get a very frustrating situation. Both persons acknowledging that they are comparatively minute areas of understanding in a world of mystery, can help and strengthen each other. But where one takes an infallible attitude and moves entirely upon the assumption that they have to be right, you remove from the life of the other person the privilege of helping someone else to be better, and in so doing you kill their lives. This situation is so frequent today and there is no point in which we reveal less understanding than in this problem of always trying to prove that we are right. Remember we never have to prove that we are right. The only thing we ever have to prove is that we are not wrong, and there's a great deal of difference in these two terms. The individual reveals his degree of rightness — but he must defend his false degree of egoistic wrongness, and no matter how much he defends it he is wasting time.

To get the reaction then from life around us, whether it is in Taoism which is given a great deal to Satori, or in Zen, or any other group of teachings relating to these problems, the great experience of the individual lies in opening the channels of understanding, and to open these channels there is this great need for what Mentis calls "the child-likeness in man". Misunderstanding is always present where sophistication exists. The child-likeness in man, that which does not complicate, that which immediately and inevitably beholds things in their simple and natural forms - that type of perception is toward the truth, or toward reality.

In the problem of studying people conditions and so forth then understanding, maturity, gentility, refinement, what Confucius would term “the estate of the superior man”, the individual who is greater than his problem, this state is attained through a receptivity, a relaxing of self, the possibility of the experience of quietude under conscious direction. It naturally then follows to the Eastern way of thinking: that every civilized person should have a time set aside for the contemplative reflection upon life. Every day the individual should take a little time: five minutes, ten minutes, whatever is possible to him, and in this time simply dedicate his resources to the attainment of his own nature. It means also that the person even from childhood should be taught that keeping still is not a punishment. That being quiet is not a punishment. A family in which there was a great deal of discord that came to my attention a while ago, had a small child, a girl about five or six years old, and she was constantly in the midst of the family feud. The family's method of punishing her was that when she was bad she had to go into a room and close the door and keep quiet. They observed that she was becoming more and more delinquent, and finally under observation she admitted that she was doing all kinds of things wrong because her condition while being punished was happier than when she was good. When she was punished she was by herself and out of the feud.

Now, being by ourselves, or being quiet, or being what we call "alone", is to most persons regarded as a punishment. Nothing could be further from the fact. The individual who cannot make his own aloneness attractive is telling us that he is deficient in Satori, he is deficient in value, in appreciation, he is without the enrichment of his own inner life, he turns into himself and finds there only disquietude, fear, anxiety; therefore he rushes back again into the humdrum existence which has become valuable to him.

By understanding we gain the power to sit quietly and observe, to recognize the importance of the observational relationship to life. Observation, however, must have its depth penetrating power. We are again too much inclined to superficially look at things. Observation, or contemplation, of things is much more than merely looking at the outsides of them, but because we again have come to judge things much by appearance, it is very important to recognize the need for observing the subtle things, the characteristics and qualities by which symbolically the internal of that person is revealed externally. That we become more aware of the person behind the body and not merely its outer form.

When we study the small dwarf Japanese tree, for example, we observe not just the little tree and say “isn't it remarkable”. The overtones of this are more important and more remarkable than the tree. They may tell of a hundred years of dedicated devotion to the simple process of directing the shape and growth of that tree. Generation after generation has taken this as a responsibility. Now, you can say, we can all say, “Could there be any more total waste of time?” Supposing someone has spent 20 years in the training or molding of a bonsai tree. What has he accomplished but a little tree that will die anyway? What has he done? He has done one tremendous thing: he has shown continuity, he has developed self-discipline, and this same person could not achieve this self-discipline in relation to the tree without achieving it in relation to other things. The tree became the symbol, but this person has learned to accept responsibility, has learned to be true to it and has learned to perform certain self-imposed duty without question and without complaint, because actually he imposed this duty on himself. No one made him take this tree to shape it. He voluntarily selected the thing he was going to do but having made the selection he assumes a moral duty in himself, the duty of being true to that which he has chosen to do, and therefore having made the decision he must live up to it or lose face. He must do that which he has chosen to do, and he must do it with a full heart, in full understanding.

This type of training would be a discipline difficult for Western man but on it is much of the importance of our way of life. Sometimes we can say, and perhaps justly, that these Eastern disciplines have not apparently produced their full result in the East. We look at the East and we do not find that it is in every way a more secure and serene world than ours is. But here again we come right back to the original problem. When we are caught in a bad action, or as we are caught angry, we have an immediate defense - our adversary was angry also, or we were provoked into this, or we say to the individual who points out our mistake, “You are doing just as badly as I am”, which we regard as a withering retort. We haven't said anything but it seems quite dramatic. We have not proven that we were right. We are not proving that he is right. We simply are insisting that two wrongs in some way work out a solution to something, when they do not.

The question therefore that we are concerned with is not whether these rules are applied by other people or not. The question is: would they help us? Do we need the kind of discipline that these rules imply. If they were invented by a group of persons who never used them, all went against them from the beginning, this has nothing to do with the essential principle.

Are the rules useful, are the rules essentially true? If they are, we are concerned with that and that alone, because our problem is something we have to solve, and it will not be solved simply because we can point out 40 other nations that haven't solved it. Plus the rule of understanding, which experience has also shown to some Western persons, is based first of all upon this receptivity to as complete an understanding of our problem as possible. That we should never pass judgment until all the evidence is in. This does not mean that if we see a situation that might become dangerous that we must accept it without question.

We have another group of "happy souls" who take the attitude that we should never criticize anything, we should never doubt anything and that we should assume that everyone is doing the best they can. Much of this is true but not to the degree that man is expected to be gullible. Understanding is not gullibility, understanding is insight. Understanding is not only our estimation of the motives of the other person but to a large degree our estimation of our own motives. Here is where again we have a tendency to fall down. We do not sit quiet and analyze our own motives. If we did we would see that in almost every instance where we are imposed upon it's our own fault. What has happened is that some wrong motive in ourselves has been played upon by another. Recognizing our weakness it has been exploited, or turned against us to someone else's profit. We wanted something for nothing, that is the easiest way of losing money there is. Because it will make us open to every kind of a fly-by-night exploitation scheme. But if the individual will seat himself firmly upon the law that “what we want we must earn and what we earn we will get” there would be very little such exploitation successful. But because we are always hoping for a miracle in a world of law and order, we are gullible, we are vulnerable to every kind of false pressure.

The moment the individual knows his own weaknesses, he realizes how he can be imposed upon and how he must protect himself. Thus honesty in these things is the basis of security for ourselves and for those around us. Our own selfishness, gullibility actually contribute to the delinquencies of others, and we gain a certain responsibility for the person whom we permit to deceive us, because we want it to be deceived.

There is guilt in these things, not only to the person we blame but to ourselves. I've known so many cases where individuals over a period of years have refused to accept others for the values that are really there. They have refused to recognize characteristic traits in those whom they liked. They have refused to recognize the weaknesses in those they were fond of and also to refuse to recognize the virtues in those they disliked. Out of this unhappy dishonesty of living, trouble, sorrow, misery, sickness will come unless we learn to control and redirect our activities.

If however we are able to be receptive, we will finally discover that nearly everyone will reveal himself to us. It is a kind of intellectual jiu-jitsu or judo. It is a process in which by simply waiting we will almost certainly finally know the truth. We do not need to impose our own judgments, the only thing that is necessary is that we observe and reflect correctly. If we so do we will know the person who is suitable for our friendship, we will know those with whom we have little in common and we will know also those whom we may be required to watch carefully lest they impose upon us.

These things come from gentle knowledge. Let us assume therefore that we have made such a classification and we have come up with a group of persons who we know would like to impose upon us. We know that either from their own backgrounds, or from their needs, or from their codes of living, their economic associations they would like to impose upon us because they may take it for granted that they are entitled to. We know these people now because we have examined them thoroughly and completely. What should our attitude toward these persons be? Our attitude toward all persons must be equally poised, reasonable and just. That these are the persons maybe of a mind to be unfair gives us no right to be in unfair to them. Nor does it give us any real reason to hate them, nor does it give us any reason to reject them as persons. What it does give us is a certain watchfulness in which we are able to meet their moves as a trained chess player will meet the moves of his adversary.

Actually if we have gone far enough in our realizations and in our thoughtfulness, we will finally come to the recognition that these persons are moving from certain attained polarities within themselves. They are doing what is next in their own temperament; out of what they are doing if they continue long enough they will come to certain inevitable misfortune, and in this misfortune they will learn the lesson that they have to know. But as the scripture also says, "Judge not, lest ye be judged", and if that one part of the christian scripture was applied in the private life of the individual we would have fifty percent less broken homes and misunderstandings in this country today. But everybody quotes it — nobody uses it, and it is the same thing when you're working with persons with whom you have certain reasonable doubts. On the ground of friendship you may, without feeling, without prejudice and without temper, be entitled to try in every way possible to point out the defects of this other person to him, not to others. You may try to offer your assistance to correct certain faults or failings which he may possess and which you through thoughtfulness have discovered. If you so offer he may tell you what is wrong with you, and if you can't accept that criticism, you have no right to criticize him. If he is right admit it, and as you have a project you will try to help him straighten himself out, he will try to help you straighten yourself out. Now, you got a job which can be far more valuable than two persons partying and never meeting again if it can be done, and sometimes it can, but it is always defeated when we refuse to accept criticism when we give it. This is wrong and gives trouble.

So if we have actually come to a certain valid conclusions, these are not the basis of hatred but the basis of a deeper effort to understand and to try to recognize that what we do not admire is part of a wall of illusion with which this other person has surrounded his own divinity. That the divinity in that other person is still there and while we may reject certain attitudes that he holds we are still required by life to acknowledge that divinity in him and treat it with appropriate respect. We may not do the things he wants us to because we believe they are wrong, but our differences must be courteous and understanding and never becoming emotionally so stressed that common sense and truth are lost.

Thus understanding means to keep a tranquil attitude in all emergency. To realize that the moment we lose control of ourselves we lose control of every situation. Whereas if we can be the one in a group to hold this control of ourselves, we can perhaps contribute to the security of all the others. The person who does not panic is the important one in any emergency, and to allow emotions to take over as hatred, fear, grievance, jealousy — these are all forms of emotional panic: where they come in, the power of leadership is destroyed, the power of direction is lost and everyone ends in a common misfortune.

The Satori has in it this concept of being quiet in the presence of situations and coming out of these situations instructed by them and not destroyed by them, and the proof that we are instructed by any situation is that we can look back upon it with gratitude. When we can look back upon our former enemy with gratitude we have mastered the problem. When we can look back upon a confused life with gratitude it means that we have finally internally found the truth in that life. For everything that happens can be regarded with gratitude. We may be grateful because under a pressure of circumstances we made a wise decision and have had the privilege of maintaining that wisdom, which is more to be desired than an easy life. It may also be that looking back upon the situation we discover that we made a serious mistake. The fact that we have discovered the mistake, have found out that it is a mistake, has been of the vastest aid to our consciousness, therefore for this too we should be and must be grateful.

Out of all relationships well-met, gratitude can naturally come, and from anything we can look aback upon with sincerity we grow. But anything that we look back upon in which we realize that we were less than we should be, this becomes the basis of an instruction which we should accept and try distinctly to strengthen the areas in which we were weak. Actually we are here for these purposes and all the security and peace that we seek will come as byproducts of being right ourselves.

Out of this relaxation also, which permits the other person to flow into us or the other circumstance to become part of our own nature, there is another situation arise. Namely this complete relaxation of ourselves permits the divine, the consciousness in us, to flow out unimpeded and move into the object of our attention.

Thus Satori is an exchange of consciousness. It is a strange subtle thing which perhaps can increase and grow until it may be a total capacity to be someone else, or to attain an identity with that which is now strange or different.

Satori means that while we are accepting his story we are moving out with positive factors with which to understand him. As he is feeling desperately to reach our consciousness with his complaint, we are also able, if we are completely relaxed, to release within ourselves the only power within us which can understand him, and that is this power which we share with him for regardless of all differences in our existences we share one life. And if we move upon the level of this life we have understanding. We have not only sharing but common identity. But upon any other level we have confusion.

The only way in which we can release this life in an unconditioned form from ourselves, or can disentangle it from its confusion when it comes from him to us, is to be completely one with this consciousness element. We have to be able to accept consciousness without modifying thought reaction. If we are able to do this we have a measure of understanding which is not a technical thing when it happens to us, but it arises from very technical causes within ourselves. We all have judgments about persons and places. If these judgments arise from a complete quietude within ourselves, they have the greater probability of being correct. The moment however they are influenced by any individual or collective preconception, the degree of error sharply increases. Therefore expectancy, which is our determination to see things as we thought they were, can forever paralyze judgment. But if we have only a gentle receptivity to the thing as it is and have the willingness to accept all things as they are, we shall have a greater wisdom, and a greater insight, and a greater charity with which to face confusion or confusing problems.

Now, in the Eastern symbolism and in the way of life of these people great effort has always been made not only to discover the life in things, but to symbolically preserve that life, to make it the basis of arts, and sciences, and philosophies. To develop from all of these things that are observed codes of conduct suitable to bring maturity and wisdom to the individual. Thus by understanding we place ourselves in a university of life. We accept all things as useful. We deny nothing. But we may be forced by our own discriminating faculties to say that some things are more immediately needed by us than others. There are things which at the present time we simply cannot understand. Our duty then is to be careful that we do not misunderstand, so in the presence of anything that is not understandable we refrain from any effort to impose our own interpretation upon it. Recognizing that as growth unfolds ourselves that which is not understood will come ultimately within our comprehension.

One of the reasons we lock ourselves against progress is because of the prevailing fear that we have of the thing which is not understood. We have had this fear individually and collectively since the beginning of time. We have demanded and required failure for that which is not understandable. We have persecuted everyone who has had a new idea and actually hoped he would fail. This is because of our imposing of negation upon that which is beyond comprehension. We make the mysterious dangerous. We demonstrate carefully and constantly that we cannot cope with mystery. Therefore wherever mystery imposes itself upon us understanding says that we must withhold all judgment. We must keep ourselves in a condition of suspended decision, waiting for the facts to reveal themselves, and not imposing limitation upon the new or enthusiastically recognizing a thing to be better simply because it is innovation. We must preserve our judgment in these things. If we hope that the new will be accomplished we will exaggerate, if we fear that it will be accomplished we exaggerate.

The only proper course is to wait with proper expectancy the fulfillment of things of themselves or from themselves, or the development of courses already set in motion to their reasonable ends. If we fear, however, that these reasonable ends may not be good, if it is obvious that some line of activity is not likely to be conducive of common benefit, then we must either defend ourselves by greater understanding from the hazard that it presents, or else we must unite in a factual way to prevent that which in our maturity of understanding we decide is dangerous or detrimental.

But we are not sure what is dangerous or what is detrimental unless we can approach these so-called dangerous things also with complete internal relaxation. It is the decision of the relaxed consciousness that alone has the validity to demand support and defense, because that means that regardless of what we're doing we are doing it with the fullest understanding that we possess, and in the majority of instances this is not the case. Our actions are not the result of the fullest effort that we can make to understand. Our actions are the result of a definite evasion of the responsibility of adequate searching, the willingness to substitute a decision for the study of the substance or subject itself.

All of these points then bring us to the essential idea of this whole concept of understanding: namely man's gracious approach to what he needs to know, graciously seeking and also in everything that he does attempting to add a dimension of understanding. The moment he does this nothing is trivial anymore, because there is nothing that the human being can do, which will not directly or indirectly add to his understanding. He will grow if he accepts growth and if he adds to his present formula for doing things this concept of action as the cause of growth, he will gain more from his activities and his endeavors.

Everything that man does he does because natural law maintains the processes by which he works, thus every action is an invitation to study the universe, to contemplate its workings and to finally bring himself in harmony with its principles. Each day then if the person will quietly examine into the problems of understanding, taking five or ten minutes for the digestion of his own life, taking a little time to determine what has been important and to review how it could have been more important, had he been able to use relaxed understanding rather than tensed reaction. And out of it will come this gradual desire to attain relaxed understanding, which is a kind of meditation, it is also a kind of prayer, it's a sacred thing in itself, for it is only in this quietude of man suspending judgment in facing the real, that man can really come to know God, or come to know the divine power in things, and to separate the true spiritual agencies of life from those tense structures which are the result of powerful emotional theologies.

The real religion of man comes in the quiet contemplation of the works of the infinite. And as man studies these works in the world around him, within his own nature and in the lives of those with whom he is associated, this study can lead to a reflection, and this reflection — to a powerful religious conviction, a religion based upon experience, upon internal contemplation and maturity. These are the principles that underlie this search for understanding, and we hope that you will find in this seeking a new and profitable way of conserving your own resources and attaining at the same time greater ends than you have ever previously been able to accomplish.